I've enjoyed working as a medical scribe at a hemophilia/thrombosis clinic and one of the providers shared an interesting study that is currently happening. What if I told you that there is a F8 gene mutation that is naturally activated but, it doesn't contradict with other players? At the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, a research team has found a natural "gain-of function" mutation on the F8 gene. By studying a 18-year-old who had FVIII activity of 300-900%, they found that this protein variant would antagonize but not activate APC at its binding site and prevents the cleavage for protein C (Wischmeyer et al., 2024). This does not alter the cascade since blood levels/factors were at normal ranges.
There are other contributors and roles that play into coagulation, but can this genetic "gain-of-function" mutation be beneficial to those who have hemophilia? Gene therapy and products exist to assist hemophilic patients in their daily activities. If this gain-of-function may help those with factor deficiency to reset, what "can go wrong" with gain-of-function? What are your opinions on the GOFR (Gain of Function Research)?
Joshua WischmeyerChristine BairdJulian Grandvallet ContrerasAlexander TranTsu PhangMarilyn Manco-Johnson; A Novel Factor VIII Mutation with Increased Activity, Severe Thrombosis and Resistance to Activated Protein C. Blood 2024; 144 (Supplement 1): 135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-202202
I probably read too much science fiction but this type of research sounds like the origin story for a super villain. I wasn't very familiar with this before your post, but it seems like gain of function gene modification is very high-risk high reward. I'm not very familiar with the daily experience of someone living with hemophilia. In your opinion are the potential risks associated with permanent gene modification justified in comparison to the current standard of living of affected individuals?
ReplyDelete